Skip to main content

Hotels pulling travelers with bigger loyalty programs

Bigger usually means better, especially when it comes to hotel loyalty programs. Otherwise, why are hotel chains building bigger travel reward programs?   


The combined Marriott-Ritz-Starwood program will take effect on August 18

Marriott’s acquired the Ritz-Carlton Hotel Group in 1995 and then the Starwood Hotels and Resorts in 2016, but it was not until this April that the company announced its plan to combine the three independent reward programs --- Marriott Rewardsthe Ritz-Carlton Rewards and Starwood Preferred Guest (SPG) under one big operation, with a tentative date set in August. The merger of these three travel reward programs brought a combined membership of 110 million travelers into the new program. By contrast, the Hilton Honors Program has about 70 million members. 

The most recent update is Marriott’s combined reward program will take effect on August 18. Starting on August 18, travelers will be able to book reward stays in the company’s 6,500+ hotels, or under any of the 29 brands that the company manages, in one platform even though Marriott has not yet announced the name for the combined reward program.

While travelers can check the availability of all Marriott branded hotels in a neighborhood for their reward stays without switching from one platform to another, they may find an increase in reward points for redemptions. Because the new program will put its hotels into eight categories, where travelers can redeem free nights strictly based on the award chart effective after August 18, travelers might find some hotels will fall into a higher category if they book after the merger. In this case, the merger (or bigger) actually means a less-favorable deal for travelers.

Accor is unifying it loyalty program too

The AccorHotels Group acquired three luxury hotel brands in July 2016. It took the hotel chain two years to merge all of its loyalty programs --- AccorHotels, Fairmont, Raffles, and Swissôtel into one Le Club AccorHotels Program. Now, the company’s 45 million members could earn and redeem reward points at its 3,500 properties worldwide.

Like all mergers, some travelers favor the changes for a larger network, but unifying the benefits across all hotel brands might have upset the “legacy members” of the Fairmont, Raffles, and Swissôtel programs. The elite members of the Fairmont Presidents Club, for example, would no longer find such perks of guaranteed late checkouts or suite upgrade certificates in the new combined reward program.

Hyatt also wants to be bigger by partnering with Small Luxury Hotels of the World (SLH)

World of Hyatt is the travel reward program operated by the Hyatt Hotels and Resorts, a company that operates more than 700 hotels around the world. Hyatt recently announced a new partnership with SLH, a network with over 500 independent luxury hotels in the global market.

While the details of this newly combined program have not been released yet, the goal of this partnership is to allow World of Hyatt members to earn and redeem points at selected SLH hotels, and vice versa.

The biggest benefit for both SLH and World of Hyatt members is the ability to earn and redeem reward points in a larger network. A bigger network is better in this case.

Are more mergers expected?

The bottom line of all hotel reward programs (or frequent flyer programs) is to foster customer loyalty towards the brand. So, if a bigger network with a more diverse portfolio can help companies keep their customers, a merger will very likely bring in good results. Would you agree?

If bigger means better, can we expect more mergers of different travel reward programs in the future? What do you think?   

Note: This post is also published on MultiBriefs.com; the picture was a screenshot from Marriott.com.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...