Skip to main content

Is Amazon exiting the restaurant food delivery business for good?


-->
Amazon Restaurants, a food delivery app like UberEats, will officially close on June 24. Amazon entered the restaurant delivery business in Seattle in 2015, but it has been struggling to compete with UberEats, Grubhub, Postmates, and DoorDash --- the four dominant players in the market that control 93 percent of the share.  

The closure of Amazon Restaurants will allow the company to focus on grocery delivery. Since Amazon purchased Whole Foods in 2017, several changes have already been observed in the high-end grocery store chain. For example, Amazon has begun tacking the challenge of fresh food delivery in Whole Foods, another area in which almost every grocery or retail store is trying to compete, including Walmart that is getting ready to deliver groceries from a local store directly to customers’ refrigerators at home. 


While it may seem a smart decision for Amazon to end its restaurant delivery service at this point, I do not believe the company wants to give up the business just yet. When the timing is “right” again, Amazon will very likely get back to the restaurant delivery service, maybe through integration with its fresh-food grocery delivery service.

The restaurant delivery business is too big to be ignored

Today, consumers want to order almost everything online and expect their orders to be delivered right at their doors quickly and inexpensively. Restaurants and grocery stores are trying hard to meet consumers’ expectations. 

Among the four dominant players in the U.S. food delivery service industry, for example, UberEats offers services in 500 cities in the U.S. Such a number for Grubhub and Postmates reaches 2,000 cities and 3,500 cities respectively. DoorDash, now at a value of $12.6 billion, leads in sales in five of the 10 largest metropolitan areas in the U.S., including San Francisco, Washington D.C., San Antonio, Dallas – Fort Worth, and San Diego. Grubhub takes the lead in New York, Chicago, and Boston.

Besides, such restaurant chains as McDonald’s has introduced McDelivery with UberEats at over 5,000 U.S. restaurants. Chili’s Grill & Bar is partnering with DoorDash, allowing the chain to offer delivery service in over 1,000 out of its 1,248 restaurants in the U.S. Other partnerships in point include: UberEats with Starbucks; DoorDash with Chipotle, Chick-Fil-A, The Cheesecake Factory, and Papa Johns; Postmates with Popeyes; and Grubhub with Yum Brands that owns Taco Bell and KFC.

Amazon is not entirely giving up the restaurant delivery business yet

The ending of Amazon Restaurants, however, does not mean the company wants to exit the food delivery business for good. Last month, Amazon just put a $575 million investment in Deliveroo, a rival of UberEats in London. So far, Deliveroo has already raised $1.53 billion since 2013 when the company started, covering such international markets like Hong Kong, Australia, France, and Kuwait, in addition to Britain.

The business insights that Amazon will get from Deliveroo are expected to help the company prepare for a strong comeback in the future, even though its restaurant delivery service is coming to an end for now. Besides, Amazon can quickly get back to the restaurant delivery business through acquisitions.   

Grocery delivery is highly relevant to restaurant delivery

Meanwhile, let’s not forget the fact that Amazon aims to improve the grocery delivery service in Whole Foods even though little progress has been reported. When more supermarkets, like Whole Foods, are also expanding their offerings in restaurant service and grab-n-go options. If Amazon can figure out an efficient way to deliver fresh food for grocery stores when most restaurants and grocers are still struggling with it, the company will find it easier to get back to the restaurant delivery business again.

So, what do you think of Amazon’s ending its restaurant delivery service? Does Amazon still want a big pie of the business but now is just waiting for the right time?

Note: This content is also available at Multibriefs.com; the picture was downloaded from Delimarketnews.com

@MultiBriefs.com via http://bit.ly/kwok061819

Comments

  1. You wrote an extremely useful article Delivery From Dubai To Abu Dhabi. I gleaned some useful information from this article. Many thanks for writing about it. I wish you continued success.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...