Skip to main content

“SoLoMo” and Legislation

The “SoLoMo” (Social, Local, and Mobile) movement has great impact on consumer behavior and business operations. Now than ever before, more consumers are using mobile payments. According to a recent report @USAToday, the number of mobile payment users is expected to surge from 160.5 million in 2011 to 212.2 million in 2012, a 32% increase; likewise, the amount of mobile payment transactions will grow from $105.9 billion in 2011 to $171.5 billion in 2012, up 62%.

Earlier this month, Starbucks announced that consumers would be able to purchase coffee with Square’s Wallet App starting in November 2012. Eventually, consumers will be able to place an order and settle the payment even before they enter a Starbucks’ store.

When promoting mobile payment options or doing mobile marketing, however, businesses have to jump through one hoop --- they must convince their customers that such mobile app is safe and reliable and that their business is trustworthy. Recently, I received a few spam text messages, telling me that I have won a BestBuy gift card or have an issue with my credit card that needs my immediate response. Like many other consumers, I become more cautious for mobile marketing messages because of spams. Thus, spams create negative impact to those authentic mobile marketing messages as well as “SoLoMo.”

The good news is FCC (Federal Communications Commission) in the U.S.  has published guidelines and oversees the policies for communications, which regulate businesses’ using email and text messaging as a marketing or a business-to-consumer communication tool. For example, consumers must choose to opt-in/double-opt-in to receive e-mail or mobile marketing messages, and companies must allow consumers to opt-out such service at any time. More recently, FCC is proposed to ban internet to phone text messages, according to this FoxNews video.

Are such legislations sufficient in protecting consumers and thus help promote the “SoLoMo” movement? What else could be done to further protect consumers?

Or, do you think legislation should be kept in a minimal level so that companies can compete with one another with more freedom? Besides legislation, what other alternatives could be helpful in promoting “SoLoMo” while protecting consumers?

Relevant discussions:
Using Cell Phones to Make Payments


References:
Platt, Spencer (October 5, 2012). Starbucks gets a Square dealUSA Today. pp. 1B and 2B. 

Comments

  1. Dr. Kwok, the final questions posted in your blog highlight several important issues related to consumer-to-customer promotion and customer protection. When exploring the FCC website, I found the following statement: "We're committed to helping consumers through information, complaint mediation, and regulatory policy. We believe that consumers deserve clear, complete information to help them make the best choices in communications services." I believe this quote best summarizes my desired status as a customer, and also allows for further advancement of the "SoLoMo" movement. Although we have a right to sign up for promotion emails and text messages, I believe they should be kept to a minimum. This issue is becoming more significant because of the reasons first stated in the blog. With more advancements in technology, such as the ability to order and pay via phone, customers are releasing more and more confidential information to companies.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their