Skip to main content

Can Airbnb help hotels increase revenue?


It is commonly believed that the growth of Airbnb has made a significant negative impact on the hotel business. There are also empirical studies that have documented Airbnb's negative impacts on hotels.
That makes sense. As a substitute of the traditional lodging products — hotel rooms — every transaction on Airbnb means a loss of revenue for hotels or online travel agents (OTAs), such as Expedia and Priceline, which also sell hotel rooms. Thus, it is not surprising to see hotels, Airbnb and OTAs are firing up for a new war.
Hotels, for example, are finding every possible way to stop the growth of Airbnb, even though hotels' book-direct strategy might push OTAs to work closely with Airbnb. Meanwhile, Airbnb is aiming big and wants to become a full-service travel company to compete with both OTAs and hotels.
So, it is really not a question of whether Airbnb has become a big threat to local hotels or OTAs. The question is: In what way does Airbnb make a negative impact on the traditional hotel business?
While there are reports that discuss the supply and demand of Airbnb listings, few studies include Airbnb's price positioning into their analysis. Price is an influential factor when consumers choose between a hotel room and an Airbnb listing. At the same time, price is an important variable in analyzing supplies and demands in economics.
Therefore, Airbnb's price positioning in a market should not be ignored when we measure Airbnb's impacts on the hotel industry.
To address this research gap, I worked with Karen Xie, a professor at University of Denver, on an empirical study that was recently published in International Journal of Hospitality Management. In this study, we answered:
http://bit.ly/kwok091717

3 research questions

  • What is the impact of Airbnb supply on the performance of hotel counterparts in a market?
  • How would such impact be moderated by Airbnb's price positioning, in terms of price difference between a hotel property and the nearby Airbnb listings in the same zip code as well as price dispersion among these Airbnb listings?
  • How would the impact of Airbnb supply on hotel performance be moderated by such quality attributes as class category (e.g., budget traveler hotels vs. luxury hotels) and average review ratings of the hotel counterparts in the same zip code?

The data and analysis

Firstly, we built a unique data set from three different sources, including Tripadvisor.com for hotel-related information, Airbnb.com for listing-related information, and Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts for hotels' quarterly performance records. Our data set is thus composed of the performance records, quality information and characteristics of hotels, as well as the price information of Airbnb listings in the market of Austin, Texas, recording 1,482 observations of 86 hotels located in 20 zip codes of the city over a period of 12 quarters from Quarter 3, 2008 to Quarter 2, 2011.
This sample covers all hotels in the Austin market during the period of observation as long as they reported financial performance data to the Texas Comptroller and received reviews on TripAdvisor. Then, we used a blend of econometrics models to perform the estimations for hypothesis testing.

The results

The supply of Airbnb listings in a market brings down a hotel's revenue per available room (RevPAR) performance, confirming Airbnb's negative impact on hotels.
However, price difference between a hotel and the Airbnb listings and price dispersion within Airbnb listings are positively related to a hotel's RevPAR performance. Such results support the "agglomeration effects" of a product's strategic orientation, in which low-cost hotels can possibly yield higher RevPAR if they are strategically located in an area with many high-priced competitors (in our sample, the average price of Airbnb listings were much higher than their hotel counterparts).
Furthermore, as the gaps in price difference and price dispersion increase, the negative impact of Airbnb supply on a hotel's RevPAR performance decreases significantly.
The negative effect of the Airbnb supply on a hotel's RevPAR performance does not significantly vary by the quality attributes of the hotel, such as class category or review ratings. In other words, hotels of different types cannot immune from the negative impacts from Airbnb.

Implications

We added "price" as an important variable into our analysis when we estimated the negative impacts of Airbnb supply on a hotel's RevPAR performance in a market. For hoteliers, this means:
  • When they are facing the threat of Airbnb, managers should also pay attention to the price positioning of the Airbnb listings in the neighborhood. If Airbnb listings are charging for a much higher or lower price than the hotel, chances are they are not competing in the same market.
  • If a hotel is located in a nice neighborhood with a lot of high-end, short-term residential rentals, the hotel may be able to leverage the "agglomeration effects."
  • As a strategy to fight back against hotels and Airbnb, many OTAs have added the list of residential rentals into their websites. OTAs now have the business intelligence of both hotels and short-term residential rentals, which could be helpful for hotels. We advise hotels to reconsider their relationships with OTAs.
  • Hotels may consider adding some Airbnb listings as part of their competitive sets when they evaluate their performance and assess their current revenue management practices.
In conclusion, Airbnb's price positioning in a market can be very influential to a hotel's performance. Are there other factors we should look into when we measure Airbnb's impacts on the hotel industry? What are your suggestions?
Note: This article was also published at MultiBriefs.com - the leading source for targeted, industry-specific news briefs. The picture on the top of this post was downloaded from LogoDesignGuru.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their