Skip to main content

More hotels are adopting the ‘asset-light’ strategy

Earlier this month, Hyatt Hotels made an announcement about the company's plan of selling its $1.5 billion worth of real estate in the next three years. By doing so, Hyatt would become another major hotel chain in the market that adopts the "asset-light" strategy, allowing the hotel to focus on franchising service with long-term management contracts.

Asset-light vs. asset-recycling strategy

Traditionally, Hyatt was known for its "asset-recycling" strategy. Under its buy-low-and-sell-high "asset-recycling" strategy in real estate, Hyatt owned and managed many properties in the market.
Even though Hyatt has no plan to sell all of its assets at this point, this new asset-light strategy is expected to bring Hyatt large cash flows that can be used in other investments, such as technology, product development and customer loyalty. Additional cash flows will also make it easier for Hyatt to acquire other hotel companies.

Is asset-light a common practice among hotel chains?

In fact, the asset-light strategy is not new in the lodging industry. In the early '90s, for example, Marriott Corporation had already split its business into two separate publicly-traded companies — Host Marriott Corporation (renamed as Host Hotels & Resorts later), a real estate company; and Marriott International, purely a hotel management firm.
Since then, Marriott International has been focusing on its core business  operations management in hotels, rather than managing assets. Marriott has experienced a phenomenal growth in the last three decades and in 2016 became the largest hotel chain.
Another good case in point is Hilton Worldwide. Hilton also announced earlier that the company was spinning off its hotel properties into a real estate investment trust, which would be operated as a separate company.

Why are hotels adopting the asset-light strategy?

The asset-light strategy turns out to be better for hotel chains. The separation of Marriott Corporation is a good example.
In the '80s — before Marriott Corporation split into Host Marriott Corporation and Marriott International — Marriott was actually in the real estate business because its focus was on building hotels, then selling the properties for a higher price while maintaining a long-term management contract of the assets.
The company not only had to carry a large amount of debts for the assets, but it also found it difficult to sell hotels when the real estate market deteriorated. The separation of Marriott's assets from its hotel management business could greatly ease the burden from debts and unsold properties, which almost led to bankruptcy for Marriott.
Additionally, the asset-light strategy allows hotel chains to concentrate on what they are doing best  the business of hotel management. Hotels are able to rapidly expand their business under the model of franchising, where a hotel chain signs a long-term management contract with a property owner as a franchiser.
Then, the franchiser would usually run the hotel business in the property on behalf of the owner. In return, the franchiser collects lucrative income from the hotel business it operates (in other words, the service it provides to the owner), such as a percentage of the revenues, loyalty fees, marketing fees, etc.
In summary, focusing on the growth of franchising business rather than real estate, hotel chains need not carry a large amount of debt. The risks of having unsold assets have also shifted to the property owners. The revenue coming from the franchising service is more predictable and receives less impact from the fluctuating real estate market, making it easier for hotels to plan for other investments.

What's next?

As hotels are facing tougher competition from OTAs, Airbnb and other room-sharing websites, it seems that more hotels are going to trim down their operations and narrow their focus on hotel management. We have seen more hotels are separating their hotel management business from real estate and even timeshares.
What do you think? Will more hotels sell their assets?
Note: This post is also available on Multibriefs.com; The picture was downloaded from EveryInvestor.co.UK.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their