Skip to main content

Does government involvement in business do more good or harm to the foodservice industry?

Image
By

The U.S. Department of The Treasury spent trillions of dollars during COVID to help people and businesses in need. Without those emergency funds from the government, many hospitality businesses would not have survived the pandemic.

Now, our world is finally getting away from the pandemic. However, many crises facing the hospitality industry are not over yet. We still need help to address the supply chain issues, labor shortage, record-high inflation, and looming concerns of the economy. Should the government continue its support?  

 

Natural gas may be one of the urgent issues needing the government’s help right now. 

 

There is a spike in natural gas prices in Southern California. For example, a family-owned BBQ and seafood restaurant in L.A.’s Chinatown found its natural gas bill went from a typical $5,000 - $6,000 to nearly $14,000 in February 2023 (Quednow & Cheng, 2023). 

 

The Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, has urged the Federal Regulatory Commission, which regulates wholesale natural gas, to investigate the incident. The California Public Utilities Commission also voted to accelerate the state’s climate credits for residential customers, who might see a credit of $90 to $120 in their February or March bill. The question is: Will restaurants and hotels that use natural gas too also get help?    

 

More municipal governments impose restrictions on restaurant use of gas-powered appliances. 

 

In 2019, Berkely became the first city in the nation to impose gas restrictions (Hamstra, 2022). Although the California Restaurant Association still holds a pending lawsuit against Berkely, L.A. has joined Berkely and other municipal governments in 2022 to ban the use of gas appliances in all newly constructed buildings, citing health and environmental concerns about using natural gas. In January 2023, the Governor of New York, Kathy Hochul, also made a proposal to end all sale of new fossil-powered heating equipment by 2030, including natural-gas-powered sources (Gould et al., 2023). 

 

While gas restrictions have gained momentum in more municipalities, each place adopted its own version of regulations. Sooner or later, restaurants in restricted areas must convert their operations and learn how to cook with electric equipment. 

 

Besides gas restrictions, more regulations are coming. 

 

Another example is that a handful of states now require cage-free housing for hens laying eggs. The State of New York is also in the process of imposing cage-free egg production. Like gas restrictions, cage-free egg legislation will for sure have significant impacts on restaurant operations. 

 

In general, are you a supporter of a free-market or command economy? Do you favor government involvement in the business? If so, in what situation? 

 

References: 

 

Gould, J., Schnitzer, K., Williams, Z., Hogan, B., & Golding, B. (2023, January 11). Gov. Hochul quietly sneaks in proposal to ban sale of gas stoves, fuels outrage across New York. New York Post. Available via https://nypost.com/2023/01/11/hochuls-plan-to-ban-sale-of-gas-stoves-fuels-outrage/

 

Hamstra, M. (2022, August 17). Restaurant operators eye electric kitchens as gas restrictions gain momentum. Nation’s Restaurant News. Available via https://www.nrn.com/operations/restaurant-operators-eye-electric-kitchens-gas-restrictions-gain-momentum

 

Quednow, C.W. & Cheng, K. (2023, February 15). High gas bill cripples Chinatown restaurant. KTLA5. Available via https://ktla.com/news/local-news/high-gas-bill-cripples-chinatown-restaurant/


Note: This article was also published in Hospitality News Magazine. The picture was downloaded from MarketWatch.com. 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

By
Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P
28 comments
Read more

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

By
When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...
5 comments
Read more

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

By
Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...
33 comments
Read more