Skip to main content

The Dark Side of Guest Service: Sexual Harassment in Hotels (by Hailey Nguyen)

Sexual harassment in hospitality is often described as “part of the job,” especially for frontline workers such as housekeepers, servers, and front-desk staff. However, this belief reflects a long-standing failure, not a workplace reality that employees should accept. Hospitality roles require workers to interact directly with guests in private or semi-private spaces such as guest rooms, hallways, and service corridors. Despite this heightened risk, many hospitality businesses still lack effective reporting systems, consistent training, and protective technologies. As a result, harassment remains one of the most underreported and poorly addressed forms of workplace harm.

The issue is especially severe in hotels. Housekeepers frequently work alone in guest rooms, with no witnesses and no ability to call for help if a guest acts inappropriately. According to surveys from UNITE Here and the Chicago hotel workers union, more than half of female housekeepers have experienced some form of sexual misconduct from guests. Many reported being cornered in rooms, exposed to flashing, or having guests answer the door naked. However, a large number chose not to report these incidents because they believed management would not take them seriously or would label them as “normal.” When silence becomes the expected response, it signals a fundamental failure within HR to provide a workplace free from harassment.

Restaurants face similar challenges. Servers and bartenders regularly deal with comments, touching, or persistent advances that are dismissed as “part of the tipping culture.” Workers often stay quiet because their income depends on guest satisfaction. In these situations, harassment is not only a safety issue but also an economic one. This is precisely why HR departments must intervene and design systems that protect employees, rather than prioritizing guests’ comfort.

From an HRM perspective, the core issue is not only the harassment itself but the absence of strong structural protections. Many hotels still rely on outdated reporting methods that require employees to speak directly to managers who might minimize their concerns. In some cases, HR only responds when a severe physical incident occurs, ignoring smaller but still harmful patterns of harassment that accumulate over time. Weak communication, minimal training, and vague policies make it difficult for workers, especially immigrants and low-wage workers, to speak up.

Hospitality companies do have effective solutions. Panic button laws, first implemented in cities like Chicago, Seattle, and Los Angeles, have significantly improved worker safety by allowing housekeepers to call for help instantly when they feel threatened. These systems strengthen accountability because hotels must track where incidents happen and document guest behavior. Major companies like Hilton and Marriott have expanded training on recognizing and responding to harassment, and more properties are adopting zero-tolerance policies that ban guests who harass staff. These steps illustrate what progress looks like when HR prioritizes employee safety over guest convenience.

Nevertheless, technology alone cannot repair a broken workplace culture. HR must also create a support system that employees can genuinely trust. This includes clear reporting procedures, anonymous options, consistent follow-up, and guaranteed protection from retaliation. Managers should be trained to recognize signs of discomfort, intervene early, and believe employees when concerns arise. Most importantly, workers need to feel that HR is truly on their side, not simply managing risk or protecting the company’s reputation.

As a hospitality management student, I believe the hospitality workplace has reached a turning point. The expectation that employees must endure inappropriate guest behavior is outdated and deeply damaging. Hospitality cannot call itself a “people-first” industry if only the guests are protected. Real service culture begins with protecting the people who provide the service. When employees feel safe, respected, and supported, their performance improves, turnover decreases, and the workplace becomes healthier and more sustainable. Moving forward, the future of hospitality HR will depend on how seriously companies choose to address this long-overlooked issue.

To close this blog-style discussion, I want to open it up with two questions:

  1. Should hotels ban guests who repeatedly harass staff, even if they are loyal, high-status customers?
  2. What additional technologies or HR strategies could further improve safety for frontline hospitality workers?

About the Author

Hailey Nguyen is a Hospitality Management major with a passion for event planning and designing memorable guest experiences at the Collins College of Hospitality Management at Cal Poly Pomona. Hailey understands the importance of HR practices in running successful events and hospitality operations. She believes the knowledge she gained in HR will make her a stronger event planner. Someone who can lead teams effectively, support employees well, and create a positive environment for both staff and guests. Her goal is to work in event management. 

Note: The picture was downloaded from The New York Times. This is an assignment submitted by Hailey Nguyen to HRT 3500 Management of Human Resources in Hospitality at Cal Poly Pomona. 

Comments

  1. After trying several switching solutions, kvms pro lite proved to be the most dependable choice. I admire its consistent connectivity and minimal latency, which significantly improves productivity when working across multiple computers throughout the day.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Hailey, I enjoyed reading your article and never thought about how sexual harassment in hotel workers is extremely common. I do believe that hotels should ban guests who repeatedly harass staff 100%. Protecting employees should ALWAYS be the priority because everyone does deserve a safe and respectful workplace. If hotels continue to tolerate the inappropriate behavior from guests that bring in revenue, it just sends a message that profit is more important than employee safety.
    Hotels can improve safety by combining technology with stronger HR practices. One important piece of technology is panic buttons, which allows employees such as housekeepers to call for help when they immediately feel threatened. Hotels could also use mobile safety apps, location tracking for staff working alone and digital reporting systems that allow employees to report harassment anonymously.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I like how this website presents the rice purity test in a clean way. The user-friendly design and smooth transitions make it engaging, while the direct format keeps things easy to follow.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Admiring this dependable mepco online bill website stands out for its speed and accessibility. The clear information and organized process make electricity bill checking easier while helping users stay informed without unnecessary hassle.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...