Skip to main content

Will home-sharing and luxury hotels recover sooner than other lodging products?

As more places are easing coronavirus restrictions, travel companies are getting ready to reopen their business. Yet, do people want to travel again soon? If so, who are the travelers?

 

STR (Smith Travel Research), a leading data analytics provider for the lodging industry, conducted an opinion survey about travelers’ attitudes towards different types of accommodation facilities based on their preference from the past experience. One assumption for such an analysis is that travelers tend to stick to the same kind of accommodation facility for their trips.

 

STR surveyed 2,391 respondents who showed interest in travel for leisure purposes from four English-speaking markets, including the U.S., Canada, U.K., and Australia. They were asked if they would take fewer, the same, or more trips over the next 12 months.

 

Using March 11th as the cutting point when the WHO (World Health Organization) declared a global pandemic, STR reported the changes in the propensity to travel by hotel segments, with some intriguing results:  

 

Luxury / superior class hotels

 

Before (March 11th): 24% would travel less; 49% would make about the same number of trips; 27% would travel more.

After (March 11th): The above number changed to 36%, 45%, and 19%, respectively.

 

Luxury hotels recover sooner post-pandemic

Mid-range quality hotels

 

Before: 24% would travel less; 61% would not change; 16% would travel more.

After: The above numbers changed to 42%, 45%, and 16%, respectively.

 

Standard / budget hotels

 

Before: 27% would travel less; 48% would not change; 25% would travel more.

After: The above numbers changed to 46%, 40%, and 15%, respectively.

 

Short-term rental / vacation rental / self-catering

 

Before: 29% would travel less; 46% would not change their travel plan; 25% would travel more.

After: The above numbers changed to 37%, 45%, and 19%, respectively.

 

Which segments will recover sooner than others? 

 

The short-term rental / vacation rental / self-catering segment appears to be least affected for post-pandemic travel. There was only an 8 percent-point change (29% vs. 37%) for the group who would travel less. In fact, Airbnb booking data has already shown a strong recovery in the U.S., Spain, and some other European markets.  

 

The above STR survey also reveals that there was only a 12 percent-point change (24% vs. 36%) for those who would travel less in the luxury / superior class segment. In the case of China where travel restrictions were lifted in April, data from Trip.com have already shown signs of recovery in short-haul trips and high-end hotels.

 


The reasons why some segments will recover sooner than others

 

Luxury and superior class hotels tend to have higher hygiene and cleanliness standards than lower-tier hotels. Additionally, hotels across different segments are running the record-low occupancy and average daily rate due to the coronavirus outbreak. It becomes more affordable to stay in luxury and superior class hotels now.

 

Meanwhile, it is important to note that STR only surveyed travelers about their attitudes towards leisure trips and that leisure travelers usually stay over the weekend nights (Fridays and Saturdays). The recent STR data have also shown a surge of occupancy over the weekends for certain submarkets.

 

The speed recovery of short-term or vacation rental, however, might seem contradictory to my earlier assessment. I expected that Airbnb guests might want to stay in chain hotels for standardized cleaning procedures/standards. It is plausible that the demand is driven by the leisure travelers, who usually travel with family members and may hence want to stay in well-equipped homes. Alternatively, it is also possible that a large number of new Airbnb bookings are for high-end facilities. Some doctors also believe certain measures, such as having a more extended vacancy period between stays, can substantially lower the risk of getting infected by COVID-19.

 

Do you see the reasons why short-term or vacation rental, as well as the luxury / superior hotels, will recover sooner than the other segments? Will the dynamic pricing strategies become even more essential in today’s lodging business when the demand is mostly driven by leisure travelers?


Note: This post is also available on MultiBriefs.com and HospitalityNet.org. The picture was downloaded from TravelandLeisure.com

 

Comments

  1. Bloomberg - Airbnb Joins Vacation-Rental Sites Seeing Surge in Demand (June 7, 2020) https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-07/airbnb-joins-vacation-rental-sites-seeing-surge-in-summer-demand

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their