Skip to main content

More foodservice workers will be replaced by robots and machines soon

Image
By

Robotic service is one of the trends that the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated. The demand for AI-powered automatic services comes from both consumers and businesses.

 

Consumers get used to automatic services

 

Many restaurant chains and (food) retail businesses have already rolled out contactless self-service through mobile apps, kiosks, and facial/palm recognition technology. When the lockdown was in place, restaurant and foodservice facilities only operated for pickup or delivery services. Many consumers tried curbside pickup and delivery service of their favorite eateries for the first time because of the lockdown. During the pandemic, the delivery business was one of the few sectors that got a boost. 

 

Now that consumers have experienced the convenience of contactless self-service, they may continue using it in future purchases. As machines, instead of real human beings, often perform those automatic services, it is safe to predict that machines will soon replace more foodservice workers.  

 

Businesses prefer robotics over workers

 

The foodservice industry quickly responded to the increasing demand for contactless self-service. Restaurants introduced new store designs with double- or even triple-drive-thru lanes, conveyor belt delivery, and food lockers for pickup orders. In some cases, restaurants got rid of the dining rooms and focused solely on delivery and pickup services. In June 2021, McDonald’s started testing AI-powered drive-thru service at 10 Chicago restaurants, where machines, but not workers, took orders from consumers. 

 

Besides meeting consumers’ demand for automatic service, the labor shortage challenge facing the industry and the rising labor costs are two other factors pushing the hospitality industry to go after machines instead of real human beings. The bottom-line is machines can work around the clock without asking for overtime pay or sick leaves. We have already seen burger-flipping robots, robotic baristas, robotic woks, delivery robots, and more in various foodservice facilities. 

 

So, the question is not about whether machines will replace foodservice workers. Instead, we shall think about what positions will be substituted and how soon robots will take over those jobs. 


Note: This article was published in the Hospitality News (magazine) in November 2021; The picture was downloaded from CHRON.com.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Cooper FarmsJanuary 11, 2022 at 8:10 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stacey Lee HRT 3500 SECTION 1January 31, 2022 at 3:54 PM

    As a hospitality major student, it is depressing hearing about robot substitution in hospitality field. I cannot deny the fact that the technology of the contactless self-service is developing and convenient for both customers and businesses. I have worked at the restaurant that offers the contactless self-service delivery app; I really did not like how it works. I made more mistakes with it because it made more complicated the work. For example, once the customer orders, the app automatically gave the estimate time. When we got busier than normal, the customer came early and complained because of the delayed order. I believe human can handle the situations like this, not the robots. I do agree with you that business who prefers the automatic service because of labor costs. How can we encourage the society that human work can increase the business over the robotic work?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Linchi KwokJanuary 31, 2022 at 9:14 PM

      Good point. Machines can "learn" over time though. We shall see.

      Delete
  3. bes unnFebruary 2, 2022 at 4:52 AM

    Hey friend, it is very well written article, thank you for the valuable and useful information you provide in this post. Keep up the good work! FYI, Pet Care adda
    Credit card processing, wimpy kid books free
    ,Essay About Trip With Family

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ashley Kim HRT3500.01April 24, 2022 at 5:12 PM

    In recognizing the inevitability of robots and machines replacing human workers in many different hospitality operations, there are many pros and cons of robots and the service they give in comparison to that or human servers. The most common position that robots serve in the foodservice industry is cashier. Within this position, they provide for efficient ordering as guests simply need to select their items on their own and can then proceed to the payment process quickly as well. However, this experience is much less memorable for the guest and can risk a higher possibility that a customer does not return because their sole experience with the operation would be based on the product, since there was not much interaction to consider the entire service as a part of their experience.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

By
Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P
28 comments
Read more

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

By
When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...
5 comments
Read more

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

By
Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...
33 comments
Read more