Skip to main content

Food banks save lives but need our support

Federal’s extended unemployment benefits and stimulus checks helped people survive the pandemic. When the extra aid came to an end, along with the high inflation, hunger was on the rise again. Rising food and transportation costs have substantially affected people’s lives and non-profit organizations like food banks that help feed families in need. 

Concerns about rising food and transportation costs

 

The grocery prices went up 6.4% in November from a year ago. People are also paying 50% more in gas prices in December. On December 14, the national average retail gas price reached $3.32 per gallon. 

 

Rising food and transportation costs mean more hardship, especially for the poorest fifth of households, who need to spend 27% of their income on food (vs. 7% among the highest earners). Consequently, some families turn to cheaper, less-nutritious foods as a temporary solution, but the unhealthy alternatives usually create lasting negative impacts on people’s health.   

 

Food banks feed people in need and help them live a more balanced life 

 

According to the Food Bank for New York City (FBNYC), over 37.2 million U.S. residents, or 11.5%, are food insecure. To make the situation even worse, when the pandemic hit in early 2020, one in four Americans were skipping meals or had to rely on food donations. 

 

In New York State, nearly 2.2 million residents (11.1%) are food insecure, of whom 50% or 1.1 million live in New York City. As a result, FBNYC provided over 100 million free meals in 2020 for New Yorkers in need. Through SNAP (formerly known as food stamps) and free tax assistance, food banks helped put nearly $38 million into New Yorkers’ pockets in 2020. Moreover, FBNYC also provided nutrition education programs to help more than 23,000 people sustain a healthy diet and active lifestyle on a limited budget. 

 

Food banks need our support

 

Feeding America, a national network of 200 food banks and 60,000 food pantries and meal programs, distributed 6.1 billion meals in 2020, three times the 2009 level. The total number of people seeking help also increased by 50% from 2019. Moreover, many people suggested it was their first time turning to food banks for help. Nevertheless, because of higher inflation, higher food and transportation costs, and fewer donations, the organization expected to see a 30% drop in food supplies. 

 

Without our help, it is uncertain if food banks can continue providing the necessary services to the people in need. In this season, let’s make a donation to our local food bank and help the people in need. 

 

Will you help? 


Note: This viewpoint was first published in Hospitality News in January 2022. The picture was downloaded from locallove.ca

Comments

  1. Jocelyn Chung, HRT 3500 Section 2April 25, 2022 at 5:08 PM

    During April of 2020, I recall seeing multiple posts on internet forums regarding ways to help those in need those times of crises. One of the posts had promoted a groceries-delivery service for those who are immunocompromised, providing a non-contract method for the elderly to have access to fresh produce. It had made me realize the devastating issue that resides in our nation—adequate access to fresh produce. While this may not be as large of an issue, food insecurity remains, and perhaps worse than ever. I still see headlines on major news networks regarding people’s experiences with the inflated prices of groceries. This deeply impacts the lives of those who provide for their families and those who live paycheck-to-paycheck.

    There is a volunteer opportunity on campus, labeled as “Farm to Pantry Project”, in which students can help plant and harvest fresh produce at the Lyle Center. All the produce goes towards the Poly Pantry, a free resource for students to access food on a weekly basis. It is a great and meaningful experience hosted by ASI, so I would encourage anyone to participate at the next one.


    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...