Skip to main content

Is it time to revisit your company's "100% Satisfaction Guarantee" Policy?

“The customer is not always right, but your job is never to show them how they’re wrong. Your job is to be professional, courteous, accommodating … even (and especially) under stress.” 

--- Steve Dorfman, Driven to Excel

 

The consumer is always right, isn’t it?

 

For decades, companies have been doing their best to ensure that their customers are 100% satisfied. Many hotels adopted the “100% Satisfaction Guarantee” policy that comes with a 100% refund if customers are not 100% happy. There is nothing wrong with companies putting the customer first, but is it now the time to revisit such a policy?

 

Is the 100% satisfaction guarantee policy dated? 

 

That should not be a concern if few customers abuse the policy. In today’s marketplace, however, such a satisfaction promise has led to more discontent among hotels and customers (Franch, 2022). Plus, service providers in the hospitality and tourism industry must deal with more demanding customers with a smaller workforce now, a situation that is unlikely to improve in the foreseeable future (Kwok, 2022).     

 

Hotel satisfaction is at an all-time low.

 

Customer complaints are soaring. At the same time, consumer satisfaction score had dropped to 71 in 2022, down from the peak of 77 in 2012, according to the American Customer Satisfaction Index’s Travel Study.  

 

How does such a policy not guarantee customer satisfaction? 

 

When consumers know that their expectations are not met, they will complain and ask for a refund. Over time, the industry has trained travelers to believe that complaining equals compensation. Some customers would always look for something wrong to point out and do so in a very disrespectful manner. Such a refund policy also adds a burden to a business when wages and inflation are already at a record high. 

 

The Hampton by Hilton has updated the policy.

 

Hampton by Hilton was perceived as the first-ever hotel chain that offered a 100% Satisfaction Guarantee policy tied with a full refund, even before Hilton acquired the hotel chain in 1999. Now, while “100% Hampton Guarantee” stays in Hampton, Hilton has removed the refund language.

 

Does your company have a 100% satisfaction guarantee policy tied with a full refund too? Is it time to revisit the policy? 

 

References

 

Franch, Sally (2022, July 6). How a hotel satisfaction promise had led to more disconnect. ABC News. Available via https://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/wireStory/hotel-satisfaction-promise-led-discontent-86290938

 

Kwok, Linchi (2022). Labor shortage: A critical reflection and a call for industry-academia collaboration. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. Available via https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2022-0103/full/html


The picture was downloaded from FloridaEscape.com


This viewpoint was first published in the Hospitality News Magazine

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their