Skip to main content

Is it time to revisit your company's "100% Satisfaction Guarantee" Policy?

“The customer is not always right, but your job is never to show them how they’re wrong. Your job is to be professional, courteous, accommodating … even (and especially) under stress.” 

--- Steve Dorfman, Driven to Excel

 

The consumer is always right, isn’t it?

 

For decades, companies have been doing their best to ensure that their customers are 100% satisfied. Many hotels adopted the “100% Satisfaction Guarantee” policy that comes with a 100% refund if customers are not 100% happy. There is nothing wrong with companies putting the customer first, but is it now the time to revisit such a policy?

 

Is the 100% satisfaction guarantee policy dated? 

 

That should not be a concern if few customers abuse the policy. In today’s marketplace, however, such a satisfaction promise has led to more discontent among hotels and customers (Franch, 2022). Plus, service providers in the hospitality and tourism industry must deal with more demanding customers with a smaller workforce now, a situation that is unlikely to improve in the foreseeable future (Kwok, 2022).     

 

Hotel satisfaction is at an all-time low.

 

Customer complaints are soaring. At the same time, consumer satisfaction score had dropped to 71 in 2022, down from the peak of 77 in 2012, according to the American Customer Satisfaction Index’s Travel Study.  

 

How does such a policy not guarantee customer satisfaction? 

 

When consumers know that their expectations are not met, they will complain and ask for a refund. Over time, the industry has trained travelers to believe that complaining equals compensation. Some customers would always look for something wrong to point out and do so in a very disrespectful manner. Such a refund policy also adds a burden to a business when wages and inflation are already at a record high. 

 

The Hampton by Hilton has updated the policy.

 

Hampton by Hilton was perceived as the first-ever hotel chain that offered a 100% Satisfaction Guarantee policy tied with a full refund, even before Hilton acquired the hotel chain in 1999. Now, while “100% Hampton Guarantee” stays in Hampton, Hilton has removed the refund language.

 

Does your company have a 100% satisfaction guarantee policy tied with a full refund too? Is it time to revisit the policy? 

 

References

 

Franch, Sally (2022, July 6). How a hotel satisfaction promise had led to more disconnect. ABC News. Available via https://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/wireStory/hotel-satisfaction-promise-led-discontent-86290938

 

Kwok, Linchi (2022). Labor shortage: A critical reflection and a call for industry-academia collaboration. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. Available via https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2022-0103/full/html


The picture was downloaded from FloridaEscape.com


This viewpoint was first published in the Hospitality News Magazine

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...