Skip to main content

Will Roomkey.com Become a Game-Changing Site for Online Hotel Reservations?

Hotels must love and hate those online travel agents (OTAs) like Expedia, Hotwire, and Travelocity because on one hand, OTAs bring more business to hotels and on the other hand, hotels have to pay commissions to every reservation made through OTAs. For years, Hotels have been making efforts to improve their own websites so that they can compete with OTAs. Many hotels now guarantee customers that they offer the lowest price on the hotels’ own websites.

According to the PhoCusWright survey reported in The Wall Street Journal, reservations through OTAs contributed 45% of all online reservations, representing $15.2 billion of hotel sales, up from $12 billion in 2009. Certainly, it is the hotels’ best interest of skipping the “middlemen” or at least minimizing their commissions paid to OTAs.

As a result of the competition, Roomkey.com was born, which serves as a search engine and will direct customers to the hotel websites that invested in Roomkey.com.  Now, Choice Hotels, Hilton, Hyatt, Intercontinental, Marriott, and Wyndham are onboard. Best Western also showed interest in this website. Starwood, however, prefers to “assess the potential benefits of this new distribution channel” before making a commitment.

In your opinions, how will OTAs respond to these hotel chains’ strategy of forming Roomkey.com? Will Roomkey.com change the competition landscape of online hotel reservations? Who will be the ultimate winner(s) of this battle? How can hotels and OTAs work together to create a win-win-win solution for everyone (the last “win” refers to customers)?

Relevant discussions:
References:
Berzon, Alexandra (2012, January 12). Hotel ally on booking site. The Wall Street Journal, p. B2. Also available online
The picture was downloaded from roomkey.com.

Comments

  1. I personally think, at least for now, the OTA's have nothing to worry about, i haven't seen any advertisement for this website and therefore wouldn't know it even existed. I think overall if it is a smart costumer they should cover all the bases, see if using a OTA is cheaper or using roomkey.com or even going straight to the specific hotels website. Since OTA's bring the promise low prices and have many websites that people can use i think until roomkey.com becomes a bigger project it will have a little bit of a tough time getting the same business as its competitors. To create that win-win-win association i think they all need to work together, try to create a site where the hotel themselves aren't losing as much money by having to go through the middle man, however like you mentioned hotel sales are up, so by increasing prices through the OTA websites may not be the best idea just to give more money to the actual hotel. I understand that making money is top priority because to keep your customer coming back you need to have good accommodations and services. It is a difficult situation to go through because one way or another i don't find it possible to have a win-win-win situation, but more of win and a "do-able" situation. It's a partnership that they will really need to go through some intensive negotiations first.

    -Samantha Dana

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Roomkey.com is a very good idea but it still has a long ways to go. I don't think it will have a huge effect on the competition between OTA's. In order to compete with the prices, either the hotels themselves should over some sort of reward (maybe a free breakfast), or discount for booking a room directly on the hotels website. The search engine is a great idea for the hotels themselves, so that the costumer is lead directly to the hotel's website but it does not really bring anything extra special that would make a costumer choose that over an OTA. In order to create a win-win situation I think the search engine should offer some deals from the OTA's. Or maybe have the OTA's website in the search engine so that way the consumer can choose which route they want to go to book their room, it would create a more fair situation for the hotel's websites to be right up next to the OTA's because I feel like some people forget that you can even make a reservation through a hotel's website, they just go to an OTA because it offers the best variety.

    - Jamie Rieff

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...