Skip to main content

Does having a controversial marketing ad worth it? (by Victoria Macias)

Pioneers of the great american burger

The job of a marketer can be very stressful. Why may you ask? Well, it is their responsibility to create an ad and campaign that attracts the right consumers and can clearly communicate what they need to in a short amount of time. The most important job, however, is to make sure the ad/campaign stands out from the rest of the ads. Many companies have gotten creative over the years, some by using celebrities, influencers, and unique concepts.

 

Some hospitality companies, more specifically, restaurant chains, have gotten uniquely creative to hold the consumer's attention for the ad. Take companies such as Carl's Jr. and GoDaddy, for example, both of these companies at one point have sexualized women to sell and move product. Carl's Jr. has made a commercial every year that features women eating fast food and wearing clothes that leave little to the imagination. With this concept in mind, the company seems to value the 'wow' or 'shock' factor it gives to its consumers. Nevertheless, there are some advantages and disadvantages to this type of marketing strategy.



One advantage of this type of marketing strategy is: anyone who is attracted to women will find these sorts of ads quite entertaining. Another advantage is that since it will be aired on television, the ad will be able to reach a much bigger audience. Moreover, if there is a celebrity in the ad, this will give the appearance of credibility and provides the consumer with faith in the product. Another advantage is that there would be a low cost per exposure. Meaning that the overall price will be high, but the total cost per viewer will be low since it would reach bigger audiences. Even though there are many advantages to these marketing strategies, there are also disadvantages to this kind of approach.

Some disadvantages to this strategy include: low selectivity (meaning the company is not targeting the public), being a fleeting message (once the advertisement is shown it cannot be retrieved or referred back to at any time), and the high initial cost for creating the content. With these disadvantages in mind, Carl's Jr, created these ads to up the wow-factor and brought more attention to the screen. However, having all attention does not mean it is good attention when looking at the rise of female empowerment, Carl's Jr. has fallen into under scrutiny with these kinds of groups over the years.

 

People can look at this campaign strategy in both ways. On one side, they may see it as completely ingenious, because it is able to bring attention to the product, and uses celebrity credibility. Another advantage is that with all the attention, commotion, and controversy, it has the potential of bringing more consumers to the company.

 

The saying "There is no bad publicity" may not be completely accurate. With the rising of the #Metoo movement, other feminist groups, and cancel culture this brings backlash to the company. Seeing that we are in a new era of woman empowerment, these ads can seem demeaning and degrading.

 

According to Pudzer, the former CEO of Carl's Jr., stated that the use of the ads saved the company from collapsing (Richarson, 2018). Ultimately, Carl's Jr has recognized this and, under the new management, has gotten rid of these types of advertisements. When looking from a marketing point, it is clear to see that these types of ads were indeed valid and caught on a lot of attention.

 

Looking from a female standpoint, these kinds of ads add to the standard of what women are expected to look like and can create body image issues among younger female viewers. What are your thoughts on the Carl' Jr advertisement? Were they effective? Do you think they should have kept making the ads?

 

About the Author

 

Victoria Macias is a third-year student at Cal Poly Pomona, with a major in hospitality management. She grew up in a small city called Victorville. After she graduated from high school, she moved to Pomona. She works for the Panda Express company, where we pride ourselves in "delivering an exceptional Asian dining experience by building an organization where people are inspired to better their lives" (Panda Express Mission Statement). Victoria has been working for the company for about a year and has realized that she wants to be in the hospitality business to help and serve others.


References

 

“Panda Careers: Panda Express, Panda Inn, and Hibachi-San.” Panda Careers | Panda Express, Panda Inn, and Hibachi-San, www.pandacareers.com/.

Richardson, Matt. “Carl's Jr. Says Goodbye to Sexy Burger Ads.” Fox News, FOX News Network, 30 Jan. 2018, www.foxnews.com/food-drink/carls-jr-says-goodbye-to-sexy-burger-ads.

 

Picture Source: https://www.carlsjr.com/menu

 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their