Skip to main content

Why Some Hospitality Jobs Feel Completely Different Than Others (by Alejandra Figueroa)


If you have ever worked in a restaurant or hotel, you have probably had this thought at least once: “Why does this place feel so stressful compared to others?” It is the same industry, similar roles, and sometimes, depending on where you work. 

So, what actually makes the difference? From what I have seen, it almost always comes down to one thing: How employees are treated. 

During my time observing and interacting with different hospitality workplaces, one thing became really clear to me. Some businesses treat employees as replaceable, while others treat them as part of a team. And that difference shows up in everything, from how employees act to how customers feel when they walk in. 

One of the biggest differences I noticed was during the onboarding process. In one restaurant I am familiar with, new hires were expected to jump right in with little to no training. There was not much structure, and asking questions sometimes felt like a burden to others who were already busy. Not surprisingly, many employees didn’t stay long. It created a cycle in which new people kept coming in and out, and the overall environment felt stressful and disorganized. 

On the other hand, I have also seen a workplace that handled things very differently. New employees were guided step by step, given time to learn, and supported by both managers and coworkers. Instead of feeling overwhelmed, they felt prepared. Over time, this created a stronger team dynamic and a more positive work environment overall. 

This experience made me realize how important human resource (HR) management really is in hospitality. It is not just about hiring people; it is about creating an environment where they can succeed. 

One concept from class that really connects to this is employee engagement. When employees feel valued and supported, they are more motivated to do their jobs well. According to Gallup (2023), workplaces with higher employee engagement tend to have lower turnover and better performance. In hospitality, that directly impacts the guest experience. When employees are happy, it shows in their service. 

Another thing I have noticed is how feedback is given. In many places, managers only speak up when something goes wrong. This can make employees feel nervous or unappreciated. But in better-managed environments, feedback goes both ways. Employees are recognized for what they do well, and mistakes are treated as opportunities to improve instead of just problems to fix. 

Something else that stands out in hospitality is diversity. People from diverse backgrounds come together in a single workplace, which can be a huge strength if managed well. Inclusive environments, where employees feel respected and comfortable, often lead to better teamwork and performance (Roberson, 2019). When people feel like they belong, they are more likely to contribute and stay committed to their work. 

Technology is also becoming more common in HR, especially in scheduling and training. While it definitely helps with efficiency, it doesn’t replace the importance of human connection. A supportive manager or a positive team culture still makes the biggest difference in how employees feel at work. 

Looking back, the biggest lesson I have learned is that small HR decisions can have a huge impact. Training, communication, and simple recognition can completely change how a workplace feels. It is not always about big changes; it is about consistency and effort. 

As someone interested in hospitality, this really changed how I view the industry. In the future, I want to be part of a team that values its employees and understands that great service starts from within. Because at the end of the day, how employees are treated behind the scenes is exactly what customers experience on the surface. 

So here is something to think about: have you ever worked at, or even visited, a place where the employees seemed genuinely happy? What do you think made that difference? 

About the Author
Alejandra Figueroa is a Hospitality Management student with an emphasis in Food & Beverage and Events. Her passion for the industry began with a love for baking and a childhood dream of owning a bakery. She initially pursued Food Science but discovered her true interest through a professional cooking class, where she developed an appreciation for hospitality and creating experiences. Now, she focuses on combining creativity with event planning and service. In the future, she hopes to own a bakery while also working in organizing events such as concerts, conventions, and other memorable experiences that bring people together. 

Alejandra Figueroa submitted this essay as a course assignment to HRT 3500 Managing Human Resources in the Hospitality Industry at the Collins College of Hospitality Management, Cal Poly Pomona. 

References 

Gallup. (2023). State of the global workplace report
Roberson, Q. M. (2019). Diversity in the workplace: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 69–88. 

Note

The first picture was downloaded from Advantage.ai

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...