Skip to main content

Should hotels offer Airbnb's new split-stay booking options too?

Image
By

Airbnb rolled out a new “split-stay” booking feature in May in response to consumers’ shifting demand for post-pandemic travel. Will Airbnb’s new booking feature become a game-changer in the lodging industry?

 

How does Airbnb’s new split-stay feature work? 

 

Airbnb will allow travelers planning a trip of one week or longer to divide their stays between two different homes (Pohle, 2022). This new feature is particularly useful when a home has limited availability for one long-term stay or when a traveler wants to try different homes during one stay. Using such a new feature, travelers will generally see about 40% more listings in a search.  

 

Why is there a need for such a new booking option? 

 

Airbnb took the lead in responding to the evolving travel behaviors. For example, flexible work promotes the “bleisure” (business + leisure) trend in the workforce, where travelers blend work with vacation for a longer stay. Then, the work-from-home or work-from-anywhere trend enables people to travel for a longer period. 

 

In the first quarter of 2022, almost 50% of Airbnb bookings were for a stay of one week or longer. Moreover, 21% of Airbnb bookings were for 28 days or more, down from 24% in the same period a year earlier but still above the pre-pandemic levels. Not every Airbnb listing is available for an extended period. Airbnb’s new feature will enable the company to provide more options for travelers and eventually capture more business.

 

Should hotels follow suit? 

 

Besides Airbnb, some travelers also turn to extended-stay hotels for long-term accommodation needs. Hotel chains like Marriott and Hyatt have already included selected homes and villas in their home-sharing arm of the business. There is no reason why hotels should avoid trying Airbnb’s new booking option in their own operations. It will be nice for travelers to set a premise for their split-stay stay in an area for different purposes on a hotel website, such as to restrict the types of rooms (e.g., suites) or find the lowest rate available with the optimal combinations of hotel stays. 

 

What do you think of the split-stay booking options for hotels? Will travelers want that? 

 

Note: This article is first published in the Hospitality News Magazine. The picture was downloaded from Rentalscaleup.com. 

Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousNovember 17, 2022 at 4:31 PM

    Split accommodations is a wonderful alternative if you can't decide between two hotels, wish to splash out on a few nights at a luxurious resort, or have no other choice owing to a shortage of available lodging. Split-stays makes it simple for customers to divide their stay between two hotels or resorts for the duration of their trip, allowing them to make the most of their time off by seeing more places and having more adventures. If you have your heart set on more than one resort hotel, this could be a very valuable choice to take into account. You don't have to decide and may book a split stay and take advantage of both.（Lucero Chen Zhu from HRT 3500 section 02）

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousDecember 2, 2022 at 6:31 PM

    All they need is a quick and reliable web connection for a seamless betting experience. Smartphones allow customers to entry any betting platform regardless of the time zone they are in. Many individuals prefer utilizing their mobile devices for gaming and gambling as a result of|as a end result of} it is a simpler and sooner means of having fun with their favourite exercise. Thanks to these apps, they will place bets online from anywhere and anytime they want. 바카라 사이트 But another is that sports activities gambling appears increasingly like good politics.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

By
Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P
28 comments
Read more

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

By
When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...
5 comments
Read more

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

By
Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...
33 comments
Read more