Skip to main content

Have You Seen the Recovery for the U.S. Lodging Industry Yet?

Finally, I found two pieces of “positive” news this week. On January 26, Jeri Clausing reported a rebound in luxury hotel segment (Travel Weekly); Deena Beasley of Reuters suggested a slow recovery for the U.S. hotel industry. Here are some of the statistics put up by these two analysts:

· Demand of luxury hotels “increases of 5% to 8% in each of the last six months” (Clausing) --- positive.
· RevPAR is expected to decline of 1.1% by PKF and 3.2% by Smith Travel Research (RevPAR fell almost 17% in 2009; Beasley) --- still suffering, but just not as bad.
· Occupancy rate will increase from 55.1% to 55.4% according to PricewaterhouseCoopers (Beasley) --- heading to a good direction with a tiny improvement (.3%).
· Corporate accounts are still controlling their travels (Beasley) --- not that positive.
· Compared to business travel, leisure travel has fallen less severely (Beasley) --- not that positive.
· The market has a demand for “family-oriented get-together” packages and “affordable luxuries” (a package with good value/amenities) (Beasley) --- sounds like an opportunity for some segments.

I read these two articles because I wanted to report some good news, but the statistics listed above do not seem too promising to me. The good news is we are not expecting to get worse in 2010; the bad news is we will not see major improvement in 2010 either. Compared to 2008, 2009 was terrible. Because 2009 was so bad, 2010 looks just fine. Regardless the industry performance, I can feel the hope from the industry professionals that our business will be improving soon. I am not sure if everyone has seen recovery already, I guess some may have. Have you seen that in your business?

References:
Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USTRE60Q4G920100127
Travel Weekly: http://www.travelweekly.com/article3_ektid209366.aspx
Picture was copied from https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGDwld3lHTsNmXRWont5SEu7b-DuuC8cR55rdaotdShUWQkQd_V_V1ioSMH7tQei1fYwdIuDCUfm32ayyDZIK2KYUNnCCzXGwvWADdk-WldNg62BbrynwY_ZVDrVUjCROS7PvDv68hBrI/s1600-h/recession-cartoon.jpg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...