Skip to main content

Commenting on Facebook Is Different from Talking Out Loud?

I am going to share another recent ABC News video as a follow-up post of last week’s discussion --- “Is it legal to fire your employee(s) who bad-mouths you or your company on Facebook?” These days, I won’t feel surprised anymore when I hear that somebody gets fired because of his/her inappropriate comments on Facebook and/or other social networking sites. Well, this is a different story.

This lady used words such as “freeeeeeks,” “uneducated,” “white trash,” and “no ppl skills” to describe her co-workers and supervisors on Facebook. She got fired afterwards. What surprised me the most is that she actually believes posting comments on Facebook is different from talking loud in office. According to this video, she did not put her company name on her profile. Neither did she use her supervisors’ or co-workers’ names. How could her “private speech” within her social networks cause her a job?

I look at Internet quite differently. Posting something on the Internet, no matter if it is private or public, the content will stay in the cyber world forever. People may also find it easier to spread words on the Internet than actually talking to someone else face to face. Consequently, I feel whatever “footprint” we leave on the Internet actually speaks way louder than a public speech. The results of inappropriate posts on the Internet could be even more detrimental.

What are your opinions? Should a person be protected from whatever s/he says within their social networking sites? Should a person’s rights of “freedom speech” be honored, regardless what content a message has and when /where this message is posted?

Comments

  1. Always assume that someone from your workplace can see your Facebook. It is a public forum. And why would a company keep someone who so openly hates working for them? Or completely trashes them? Just because you don't list who you work for does not mean people do not know this info. They are after all on your friends list..

    ReplyDelete
  2. This particular passage of blog actually do alert and gives me some complicated feelings.
    In the 20th century especially to young generations ( who were born after 1990s) , social media like facebook, twitter, myspace, even messenger (msn, ebuddy, facebook chat, googlechat) became part of our social life. We not only use these social media as a medium to communicate, most of us spend most of the time on it as well. These social medium became a "leisure-time" tool. Gradually a lot of us (the young generation including myself) will forget the importance of seriousness of what you might express.
    Therefore, Blog, facebook etc. are a tool for young generation to whine and complain about their life. They will not think of any adverse effects of these words when they are SO "USED" to these social media tools.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their