Skip to main content

Can a Tough Cell Phone Policy Teach Teenagers Cell Phone Etiquette?

Cell phone is no doubt an important tool for communications. However, it is inappropriate and sometimes rude if one uses cell phones during class, meetings, seminars, business lunch, a date, job interviews, or other functions that needs the person’s attention. Since schools are the places where future leaders are educated, should schools teach students good cell phone etiquette by enforcing a tough cell phone policy? When I say “tough,” I mean locking up the cell phones for up to ONE YEAR for those repeat offenders. If a student refuses to turn in his/her cell phone, s/he could be suspended from schools.

Does it sound crazy? This Fox News video reports that a high school in Bay Area (California) is taking the “tough” approach I mentioned above. Those who support this policy believe that schools need to teach students the consequences of their behaviors. If a school has a policy but fails to enforce the rules, students will not learn anything.

If you are a manager, what is the cell phone policy in your work place? How do your company and you enforce the policy? If you are against such a cell phone policy, what other methods can be used to teach students cell phone etiquette?

Comments

  1. When I was in high school the policy was if it is seen in class the teacher may take it until the end of the day. At that point you could pick it up. I don't feel that a tough policy against cell phone use is fair or necessary. Considering that our whole way of life is changing in the sense that constant socialization and networking is at the core of this decade and I'm sure of the decades that follow. It's just a way of life and school are going to have to accept it. No way should a school have that much power to take a phone away for a year, that's boarder line illegal, schools have WAY to much authority, but that's a different rant. If they really wanted to fix the problem here's a good solution. Invent a signal blocking device that goes into the class room so no one has service. Problem solved.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Maybe in the future, all classes will be delivered with cell phone devices or something like Podcasting. Then, students shall be able to do "multi-tasking" as they wish --- texting, browsing the Internet, or even talking with their cell phones while checking out class lectures or learning through Podcasting. But before the future arrives, what shall we do?

    If students were allowed to use any cell phones for anything in class as they wish, considering that we are living in America, the land of freedom, shall professors be also allowed to text, talk, or browse the Internet with their cell phones while teaching a class or speaking to students? How would you feel if your professors pay more attention to their cell phones than you while you are in class or trying to talk to the professors, Phil Spinelli?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I do not think schools have the right to take a students cell phone away for up to a year. That punishment sounds silly and ludicrous to me. I interpret that as theft. The school is taking a product that you bought and pay a monthly fee on and holding it for a year. That is ridiculous. I went to a high school where they tried implementing these new cell phone rules like holding it for a night and one Friday in lunch, during our leisure time, I was caught on my cell phone and they tried to take my phone for the weekend. Well after long debate we agreed I could get my phone after class. I think students should be allowed to use their cell phones during lunch and off periods, but should not use their phones during class time. I think a good punishment for being caught using your phone during class is it initially gets taken for the remainder of the school day and repeat offenders should receive detentions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Besides helping the environment, what other benefits can restaurants see from green food packages?

Restaurant curbside pickup evolved from the old-fashioned takeout service and has gained momentum since COVID. Restaurateurs embrace the concept, and consumers want it. Curbside pickup will remain an essential restaurant distribution method even after the pandemic. Do off-premises restaurant services add a burden to the environment? The surge of restaurant off-premises services (curbside pickup, takeout, or delivery) could harm the environment because many retailers use food containers and packages made of plastic for one-time usage. Research shows that our world populations produce 130 million tons of single-use plastic a year (including more than food packages here), but in the U.S., only 8% of all plastic products get recycled. Some restaurants have begun using more sustainable materials in food packaging (e.g., disposable containers). Their efforts deserve a round of applause! Nevertheless, it is unclear if their good deeds can also bring them monetary rewards. For example, can gr