Skip to main content

Can a Tough Cell Phone Policy Teach Teenagers Cell Phone Etiquette?

Cell phone is no doubt an important tool for communications. However, it is inappropriate and sometimes rude if one uses cell phones during class, meetings, seminars, business lunch, a date, job interviews, or other functions that needs the person’s attention. Since schools are the places where future leaders are educated, should schools teach students good cell phone etiquette by enforcing a tough cell phone policy? When I say “tough,” I mean locking up the cell phones for up to ONE YEAR for those repeat offenders. If a student refuses to turn in his/her cell phone, s/he could be suspended from schools.

Does it sound crazy? This Fox News video reports that a high school in Bay Area (California) is taking the “tough” approach I mentioned above. Those who support this policy believe that schools need to teach students the consequences of their behaviors. If a school has a policy but fails to enforce the rules, students will not learn anything.

If you are a manager, what is the cell phone policy in your work place? How do your company and you enforce the policy? If you are against such a cell phone policy, what other methods can be used to teach students cell phone etiquette?

Comments

  1. When I was in high school the policy was if it is seen in class the teacher may take it until the end of the day. At that point you could pick it up. I don't feel that a tough policy against cell phone use is fair or necessary. Considering that our whole way of life is changing in the sense that constant socialization and networking is at the core of this decade and I'm sure of the decades that follow. It's just a way of life and school are going to have to accept it. No way should a school have that much power to take a phone away for a year, that's boarder line illegal, schools have WAY to much authority, but that's a different rant. If they really wanted to fix the problem here's a good solution. Invent a signal blocking device that goes into the class room so no one has service. Problem solved.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Maybe in the future, all classes will be delivered with cell phone devices or something like Podcasting. Then, students shall be able to do "multi-tasking" as they wish --- texting, browsing the Internet, or even talking with their cell phones while checking out class lectures or learning through Podcasting. But before the future arrives, what shall we do?

    If students were allowed to use any cell phones for anything in class as they wish, considering that we are living in America, the land of freedom, shall professors be also allowed to text, talk, or browse the Internet with their cell phones while teaching a class or speaking to students? How would you feel if your professors pay more attention to their cell phones than you while you are in class or trying to talk to the professors, Phil Spinelli?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I do not think schools have the right to take a students cell phone away for up to a year. That punishment sounds silly and ludicrous to me. I interpret that as theft. The school is taking a product that you bought and pay a monthly fee on and holding it for a year. That is ridiculous. I went to a high school where they tried implementing these new cell phone rules like holding it for a night and one Friday in lunch, during our leisure time, I was caught on my cell phone and they tried to take my phone for the weekend. Well after long debate we agreed I could get my phone after class. I think students should be allowed to use their cell phones during lunch and off periods, but should not use their phones during class time. I think a good punishment for being caught using your phone during class is it initially gets taken for the remainder of the school day and repeat offenders should receive detentions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their