Skip to main content

Seeking Online Feedback from Customers: How Proactive Can It Be?

Online comments can significantly influence customers’ purchasing decisions. Some hospitality companies have created full time positions to monitor and respond to online reviews. My question to hospitality companies is: Are we proactive enough in promoting positive feedback while responding to negative comments?

Last week, I ordered a small gift online. It states on the receipt that:

Please take a moment to leave us
POSITIVE FEEDBACK
(a score of 4 or 5)

Please contact us at *** (e-mail address)
or *** (phone number)
before leaving any negative or neutral feedback.

(Followed by a coupon code for next order online)

I give this retailer two thumbs up because this statement (company) not only encourages customers to post positive feedback but also proactively reacts to customers’ negative or neutral comments if there is any before they publish anything negative online. I stay in hotels several times a year, and I eat in restaurants quite often, some of which have my e-mail address on file. However, I have never received any e-mails or inquiries with similar content directly from hotels or restaurants --- even though I received requests for online reviews from TPIs or OTCs (“third party intermediaries” or “online travel companies”) such as Expedia or Orbitz. I have never seen any restaurant or hotel receipts with similar statements either. I believe hospitality companies can also be as proactive as this retailer in seeking customer feedback. What are you suggestions in promoting positive feedback from customers?

For relevant discussion, please check out the following posts:
References:
Picture was downloaded from http://www.nprove.co.uk/page9.htm

Comments

  1. Those operations in service industry such as hotels and restaurants, should do something to have positive comments from customers, not just seeking customers those who are satisfying their services. In other words, the hotels and restaurants should make customers feel the service was worth to give positive feedback.
    Customers want good service the most, and then price or other things etc. To promote positive feedback from customers, they should provide good services including a great quality in food and taste, and good price.
    As a customer, I would be pleased to give a positive feedback if a good service is provided even if they do not ask me for.
    Also, I do not think that accepting negative comments is bad idea. It sometimes might be more helpful to the operations to develop in better shape in the future. If they only accept positive views and comments, there will not be any movement forward.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their