Skip to main content

Credit Card Hackers Target Hospitality Companies

This week, many media reported that hotels become the most visited place by credit card hackers. Among all the credit card hacking cases, 38% involved with hotels, 19% with financial services industry, 14.2% with retails, and 13% with restaurants and bars (The New York Times). By combining the figures of hotels, restaurants, and bars, 52% of these cases were associated with the hospitality industry.

Large amount of daily credit card transactions in the service industry attracts hackers. Media also believes that hotels’ inadequate data security creates opportunities for hackers. So far, credit card companies have been pushing merchants to adopt uniform security standards. I believe it is time for hotels and restaurants to reevaluate their existing data security systems.

As to customers, I offered some tips on how to protect our privacy during a hotel stay in my March 7’s discussion. I hope I will see some improvements from the industry next year.

References:
The New York Times (July 5): http://tinyurl.com/linchikwokblog07082010-2
Picture was downloaded from NowPublic.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwokblog07082010P

Comments

  1. If your on a public wifi spot on a secure page (https) it is possible like for hackers to "sniff" your SSL traffic.. This means they can swipe your passwords - email, facebook, banking, UK payday loans online forms ect.... Don't believe me? Just google the word "faceniff". It's an android app that is designed to steal fb passwords with ease. The ONLY way to secure your personal safety on public wifi netoworks is through a VPN. An OpenVPN connection like offered by TorGuard will create an encrypted traffic tunnel that hides your traffic on the local wifi network. Using a VPN is the only way to guard your privacy at a public wifi hotspot.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...