Skip to main content

Do You See the Big Picture?

It has been more than 50 years since Theodore Levitt’s “Marketing Myopia” was published in Harvard Business Review (The McKinsey Award Recipient in 1960). However, time has not make Levitt’s idea less important. The article was reprinted as one of the Best of Harvard Business Review series in 2004.

Levitt illustrated several vivid examples of how product or research orientation firms failed to sustain growth over time while some customer oriented companies survive in competition:
• “The railroads are in trouble today not because that need was filled by others (cars, trucks, airplanes, and even telephones) but because it was not filled by the railroads themselves. They let others take customers away from them because they assumed themselves to be in the railroad business rather than in the transportation business.”
• “Hollywood barely escaped being totally ravished by television. … It thought it was in the movie business when it was actually in the entertainment business.”

Levitt suggested business needs to begin with customer needs. Then, it moves backward where the industry develops ways to meet those needs. “The organization must learn to think of itself not as producing goods or services but as buying customers, as doing the things that will make people want to do business with it.”

In conclusion, “sustained growth depends on how broadly you define your business --- and how carefully you gauge your customers’ needs.” We know there is more than one factor that contributes to a company’s or an industry’s success, yet Levitt made a case that customer-oriented companies with a big vision win. For those who make critical decisions for an organization, it is important to ask: What do customers need? What is presented in the “big picture”?

If you have time, I suggest you to read Theodore Levitt’s article of Marketing Myopia. It is a marketing classic.

References:
Levitt, T. (2004, July-August). Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review: Top-Line Growth. Picture was downloaded from http://www.lancemartin.net/?p=381

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their