Skip to main content

Still Feeling Reluctant to Adopt a Social Media Strategy? Please Think Again

I attended one industry session about social media in this year’s I-CHRIE Conference. Four industry professionals from White Lodging, Hyatt, Sodexo, and Marriott discussed their experience of using social media to boost bottom line.

Their presentation focused on the “big four” tools --- Facebook, Linkedin, Twitter, and blogs. The content was very similar to the information presented by those event management and human resource management professionals at the Big Event Show and the SHRM Conference. What surprised me in the CHRIE Conference is I still felt the reluctance of adopting social media by the audience.

One voice I heard is “it takes too much time to manage e-mails already; I don’t have time for social media.” I can certainly relate to that because many CHRIE members are college professors and graduate students. Research and teaching have become their top priorities. However, my question is: why can’t college professors use social media tools to enhance teaching and help answer the research questions about social media that are raised by the industry? Researchers are encouraged to conduct “cutting edge” research that has strong practical implications. If they do not understand social media, how can they make significant practical contributions and make any impact? Here, I am not trying to push everyone to do research on social media, but at least, we need to speak the “language” that the industry uses. Social media has become very important even in academia. For tips of how to better manage your time when using social media, please visit my previous discussion of Tactics that Prevent Us from Wasting Time on Social Media

The second reluctant voice is about protecting the “valuable” internal information within an organization. I understand that. My questions are: how well can we control others or the information being shared? Why can’t we share valuable information with others? Good news is supposed to be shared with others, right? If we don’t tell, will others keep our “secrets”? In the Web 2.0 age, people “communicate” with each other at any time. Rather than “protecting” the information, can you reach out and encourage people to share the information we want them to share?

I am a hospitality professional. Yet, I read the news articles from The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and Inc.com more often than Hotel-Online.com. On August 2, Inc.com just launched a more interactive tool called “AskInc,” encouraging readers to ask questions. Hotel-Online.com has very good hospitality articles, but it does not link with any social media tools. Even if I find some useful information from Hotel-Online.com, how can I share with others? My point is people and companies need to respond to the changes of how people communicate and become more proactive in managing their online reputations. Having a social media presence will allow the stakeholders interact with each other and share more information. I believe the future belongs to those who are willing to share. For more discussion about managing your online reputation, please visit Video from FoxNews.com: Managing Your Online Reputation

If you still feel reluctant to social media, please share your concerns with us. Otherwise, please share your great experience of using social media.

References:
Picture was downloaded from: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08052010P

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...