Skip to main content

Michelin and Zagat Restaurant Reviews: Which One Do You Value More?

Earlier this year, we talked about what kind of online reviews about hotels and restaurants consumers may trust. Today, Bruce Palling at the Wall Street Journal discussed the differences between Zagat and Michelin reviews on restaurant ratings. My questions are: (1) Between Zagat and Michelin, which one do you value more than the other? (2) Which rating method do you trust the most?

For more than a century, Michelin is “the guide” for restaurants. Initiated in Europe, Michelin rates restaurants based on the feedback from anonymous inspectors and publishes their review once a year. Its territory has expanded from Europe to U.S. and Far East. Recently, it started using social media tools like Facebook and Twitter to promote Michelin and the ratings.

Zagat, on the other hand, is a relatively new guide for restaurant ratings. Zagat solely relies on reader surveys. North America is the biggest market for Zagat, followed by Europe and Asia. Zagat updates its online review more frequently as compared to Michelin’s annual printed review. A recent trend identified by Zagat is that it earned more revenues from iPhone or iPad apps than those from other channels.

To me, both ratings can be trustworthy and very useful. Michelin uses “experts” or “inspectors” to evaluate a restaurant. These “experts” can provide in-depth descriptions of their restaurant experience and explain why a star is given or taken off. Zagat asks readers to rate their restaurant experience in a survey. If the scale is valid and reliable, a consumer can easily predict his/her experience of a restaurant based on other readers’ ratings. Honestly, I cannot see how one method is absolutely superior to the other. I prefer to see a rating system that values both inspectors’ and readers’ feedback because I believe a mixed methods approach will allow consumers to see a more complete picture as compared to a single method. What do you think?

References:
The Wall Street Journal: http://on.wsj.com/ai7qMm
Picture was downloaded from http://www.cakehead.com/archives/2007/10/

Comments

  1. I think both of these restaurant guides are both very useful. Since the Michelin Guide, uses “experts”, it would be better for the upscale restaurants. I also believe the Zagat Survey is better for those restaurants in those little towns that the common folk do not realize that they are there. Those restaurants that just have the local flavor but it is not one of those high scale places that would stand out to the common eye. Of course you should use both these ratings comparatively in order to influence the best restaurant to go to in your opinion. It is easier to sway your opinion to the negative then it is to the positive.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, thanks so much for these tips! My blogs usually do bring readers and responses. One thing I do is engage with the readers. Answer questions in responses and make clarifications where needed. I think they appreciate that I take the time to talk to them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their