Skip to main content

Senior HR Panelists Session: The Future of HR Professionals --- 3rd Day at the SHRM Conference (Part I)

What role do HR professionals play in organizations when facing today’s challenging economy? Where do innovations come from? What skills and competencies do HR professionals need?

Today’s general session featured a panel discussion of four senior HR professionals and addressed above timely questions. Angelia Herrin, Editor of Research and Special Projects of Harvard Business Review served as the moderator. The panelists included Michele Toch, VP of HR & Administration, Northrop Grumman Information Systems, Shannon Deegan, Director of People Operations - Strategy, M&A and Staffing at Google, Conrad Venter, Global Head of HR, Deutsche Bank AG, and Paul Records, Senior VP and Chief HR Officer for Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Hospital.

The role in HR has changed dramatically over the years. HR needs to be the counselors, business advisors, and the project managers of a company (Toch). HR is the department that initiates and leads changes. Venter emphasized the value that HR brings to an organization. Transformational HR has replaced yesterday’s transactional HR. Deegan linked HR with ROI (Return on Investment). In Google’s culture, analytical skills are important. Google builds a “trustful” environment that welcomes employees’ feedback and innovative ideas. HR needs to demonstrate results and help increase productivity (Venter).

Innovation is crucial. Besides technology, innovation can come in a variety of forms, including new business models and process (Toch). Innovation needs to be supported by the leadership team of an organization. Companies are recommended to recognize and reward people with innovative ideas. Google allows employees to spend 20% of their work time on any project they want to work --- literary, an employee can take one day off every week to work on anything he/she wants (Deegan). Corporate decisions in Google are incredibly transparent to all employees. The company creates a culture that encourages employees to connect with each other at work. Kaiser Foundation used internal social networking tools to encourage employees to share information (Records).

Everyone agreed that HR professionals are facing many challenges in the work place when facing such a tough economic downturn. The panelists shared their experience regarding to training and development with a tight budget. When discussing the skills needed by tomorrow’s HR professionals, Toth believes that loving people and knowing the basic HR functions are not enough; they also need to have the knowledge of accounting, finance, marketing, technology, and strategic management. Venter believes business should come first among everything. There is no future for a HR person if he/she only focuses on the traditional HR functions. Records suggested the ability of developing people and delivering (business) results are the key. In conclusion, a company’s HR strategy cannot be separated with its business strategy (Deegan). Google’s “people strategy” moves people from one part of the business to another and develops people with multiple specialties.

The professional of HR has changed, which brings challenges and creates opportunities for those who can adapt to the new competitive environment. Do you agree with the panelists? What do you see the future of HR?

References:
Pictures of Angelia Herrin (1st from the top) Michele Toth (2nd) Shannon Deegan (3rd) Conrad Venter (4th) Paul Records (5th) were downloaded from: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok06292010

Comments

  1. Sean Lyons Group is one of the most highly respected hospitality executive recruiters that you’ll find. Whether you are looking for experts or are looking for a career in the resorts, hotels, casinos, or entertainment industry, we can provide you with a helping hand in picking the best. Florida Hospitality Executive Search

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...