Skip to main content

Obama's Plan of High-Speed Rail --- Not An Impressive Change

President Obama announced an $8 billion stimulus plan of building high-speed rail projects across the nation. I don’t know when local governments will receive the money and start working on this project, but I believe high-speed rail will more or less impact the service industry. I just question how much the impact would be.

High-speed rail makes travel between cities faster and easier. Airlines may not like Obama’s plan because people would probably be more than happy to travel by high-speed train than air. I will probably visit NYC or Chicago more often if it takes less time to commute by train. Likewise, more people from the hubs might also want to get away and see what Upstate New York offers. As a result, restaurants, bars, fairs, parks, and events may be able to attract more patronage. The bad news is people might not want to stay in a place overnight unless they have to. Then, local CVBs really need to pull things together and market a place well in order to keep visitors staying for more than one day.

I feel the level of impacts depends on the speed of these high-speed trains. Honestly, I expect more from Obama’s plan. Compared to the bullet trains that are already operated in Asia and Europe, the speed of the U.S. trains falls far behind. China just built a high-speed rail, on which a train can run more than 240 mph (394.3 kph). With that speed, people can travel from NYC to Boston, D.C., and Syracuse within an hour. That sounds real change to me. Under Obama’s plan, we will be able to increase an Upstate passenger train from 79 mph to 110 mph and cut the travel time between Syracuse to Penn Station from 5.5 hours to 3.5 hours. I feel the U.S. can do a lot better than that. What do you think?

References:
Associated Press (February 1, 2010). http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2010/02/high-speed_rail_has_benefits_b.html (picture was also copied from this website)
CRIEnglish.com: http://english.cri.cn/6909/2010/01/28/1781s546242.htm
Syracuse.com (January 29, 2010). http://www.syracuse.com/kirst/index.ssf/2010/01/post_26.html

Comments

  1. Anschutz preps luxury cross-country train tours (05/21/2010; Denver Business Journal)

    Denver billionaire Philip Anschutz is preparing to launch cross-country, luxury train tours to take well-heeled passengers to Niagara Falls, N.Y., California wine country and national parks across the West.

    ...

    Read more: http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2010/05/24/story2.html?b=1274673600^3384831&s=industry&i=travel

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their