The January issue of Cornell Hospitality Report discusses the relationships between guests’ familiarity of a hotel’s revenue management practice and guests’ perceived fairness of differential room rates. Taylor and Kimes (2009) collected 815 scenario-based questionnaires in the fall of 2008 and reported the following:
1. Compared to the group who were less familiar with differential pricing policies, those who were more familiar believed the scenarios fairer and less unfair;
2. Respondents who read the leisure scenarios rated fairer and less unfair than those who read the business scenarios;
3. Men, compared to women, and younger respondents, as opposed to older respondents, rated fairer and less unfair.
In addition, frequency of hotel stays is positively relative to perceived fairness and negatively relative to perceived unfairness --- in this case, is “higher frequency” correlated with “more familiar”? There is no statistical difference between perceived fairness or perceived unfairness in terms of brand class (e.g. five-star vs. three-star). In the end, they presented a regression model of return intentions:
Return Index = .785*Fairness Index - .155*Unfairness Index
Based on these research findings, they made the following suggestions to hoteliers:
1. Reveal rate availability and conditions on hotel website, third-party reservation websites, and through the reservation office.
2. Clearly state the conditions associated with promotion rates.
3. Train reservation associates and front office agents on how to respond to the inquiries of differential rates.
Hospitality professionals may need to learn from the airline industry. We all know it is very likely that the person who sits next to us on the same plane pays a different price, but does it bother us much if somebody pays less than we do when we travel?
References:
Taylor, W.J., & Kimes, S.E. (January 2010). How hotel guests perceive the fairness of differential room pricing. Cornell Hospitality Report, 10(2).
Cartoon was copied from http://www.cartoonstock.com/
1. Compared to the group who were less familiar with differential pricing policies, those who were more familiar believed the scenarios fairer and less unfair;
2. Respondents who read the leisure scenarios rated fairer and less unfair than those who read the business scenarios;
3. Men, compared to women, and younger respondents, as opposed to older respondents, rated fairer and less unfair.
In addition, frequency of hotel stays is positively relative to perceived fairness and negatively relative to perceived unfairness --- in this case, is “higher frequency” correlated with “more familiar”? There is no statistical difference between perceived fairness or perceived unfairness in terms of brand class (e.g. five-star vs. three-star). In the end, they presented a regression model of return intentions:
Return Index = .785*Fairness Index - .155*Unfairness Index
Based on these research findings, they made the following suggestions to hoteliers:
1. Reveal rate availability and conditions on hotel website, third-party reservation websites, and through the reservation office.
2. Clearly state the conditions associated with promotion rates.
3. Train reservation associates and front office agents on how to respond to the inquiries of differential rates.
Hospitality professionals may need to learn from the airline industry. We all know it is very likely that the person who sits next to us on the same plane pays a different price, but does it bother us much if somebody pays less than we do when we travel?
References:
Taylor, W.J., & Kimes, S.E. (January 2010). How hotel guests perceive the fairness of differential room pricing. Cornell Hospitality Report, 10(2).
Cartoon was copied from http://www.cartoonstock.com/
Comments
Post a Comment