Skip to main content

Respond to Online Negative Reviews

Web 2.0 (social media) allows customers to post their reviews online, which creates Word-of-Mouth (WOM) marketing effect for hotels and restaurants. As managers, we certainly want our guests to post positive comments and hopefully, spread such positive feedback to as many people as possible. However, no matter how hard we try, we may occasionally see some negative reviews. The questions are when we shall respond to a negative review and when we should NOT respond to a negative review.

Lisa Barone initiated a discussion at SmallBuzTrends.com on March 17. I think she made some really good points. I agree with her that we shall respond to a negative review when
(1) we made a mistake --- then fix it,
(2) guests made a false claim --- then defend for ourselves,
(3) more and more guests agree to a negative comment --- probably that is real problem. Then, acknowledge the problem and fix it,
(4) we are certain that we can win back the customers by addressing the problem --- then address the problem for the guest.

More importantly, we should NOT respond to a negative review when
(1) the reviewer has a tendency of posting negative comments everywhere --- please ignore him/her and focus our positive energy in something else more important, or encourage more positive feedback from other guests.
(2) “it will do more harm than good” --- please use our best judgment and not to irritate a guest who is already on fire.
(3) we still feel angry about a comment --- please calm down before we respond to it.

These are excellent suggestions. I just would like to add two more comments:
(1) From our previous discussion in this blog, we found guests also pay attention to consistency of our hotels’ or restaurants’ reviews and ratings. While we should take negative feedback seriously, we shall not feel bad for only one or two random negative feedback.
(2) We need to be proactive and try to lead our guests to follow our discussion. In my opinions, managing a good Facebook and Twitter account to engage with our “loyal” fans could be more beneficial than passively responding to guest feedback.

References:
Small Business Trends: http://tinyurl.com/LinchiKwok03232010

Picture was copied from: http://tinyurl.com/LinchiKwok03232010P

Comments

  1. U.S.A. Today discussed a similar topic today (03/23).

    http://www.usatoday.com/travel/hotels/2010-03-23-businesstravel23_ST_N.htm

    ReplyDelete
  2. Open Forum by American Express discusses 5 ways to manage critics:

    http://ow.ly/1qu8Fj

    ReplyDelete
  3. Employing social media to promote a business is the best choice that you can have.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Point well made.It'll help if you acknowledge your mistake and fix it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, with

The challenges of SB 93 (California Senate Bill No. 93) will impose on the employers and their human resource management team (by Brittany Schaffer)

The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020, and it has caused massive changes within a short period of time. One of the most rememberable effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was that businesses had to come to a complete halt, forcing them to lay off employees. California's unemployment rates went up.  Now that the stay-at-home orders have lifted, people start to come out. Businesses are now reopening, looking to rehire their laid-off employees. Before the pandemic, employers had the option of recalling only a certain number of laid-off employees they would want to rehire based on employees' job performance. That option had been changed after Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law - Senate Bill 93, which went into effect on April 16th, 2021. The California Senate Bill No. 93 (SB 93) According to SB 93, companies in specific industries, mainly the hospitality industry, have the obligation to provide job opportunities in written form to qualified employees being laid off due to COVI

The complicated situation of tattoos in the workplace (by Harry Law)

Tattoos are a form of expression that convey the individuality of their owners. They can represent a multitude of things, like a tie to a family member, a favorite quote with a special meaning, or even a favorite cartoon character. Tattoos also can carry great cultural and/or religious significance. Every tattoo is unique and says something about the individual person who wears it. The problem that many companies face is when a tattoo is considered appropriate and when it should be covered.  Employees are after all the faces of a company, so the tattoos on their bodies are connected to and represent that company as well. Some workplaces have instituted rules and regulations when it comes to their employees’ tattoos, but there can be negative consequences when a company goes too far in telling their employees what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. The Disney Company has recently changed its policy on tattoos. Disney’s goal is to create a magical, fantasy experience for their