Skip to main content

Hilton Should Have Known “Game Theory” Better


Hilton is often in news these days. This time is not about its Denizen brand; it is about InternationalContinental’ (IHG) reaction to Hilton’s decision on its loyalty program.

While Hilton devalued HHonors members’ points by 20%, IHG announced the “Luckiest Loser” campaign. IHG offers its Priority Club Rewards member who has the highest HHonors points 2 million Priority Club points, which is good for 80 hotel stays. In addition, another 20,000 “lucky” HHonors “losers” will gain a total of 400 million Priority Club points to make up their lost in HHonors points.

Probably, nobody will argue that it takes more money and time to retain existing customers than to “create” new clients. This “Luckiest Loser” campaign not only helps the IHG gain more “loyalty” customers but also “attacks” its major competitor’s loyalty program. What a brilliant strategy!

Under game theory, competitors’ expected reactions will affect the decisions of an organization. Before making the decision of devaluing its HHonor points, Hilton probably failed to consider the reactions of its competitors. Who would imagine IHG will launch the “Luckiest Loser” campaign? Once again, another evidence suggests us to keep an eye on IHG (we discussed the makeovers of Holiday Inns a week ago via http://linchikwok.blogspot.com/2010/01/upgrade-of-holiday-inn-from-logo-to.html).

References:
CNBC.com: http://m.cnbc.com/us_news/35219817/1
Yahoo!Finance: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/IHGS-Priority-ClubR-Rewards-prnews-1743362247.html?x=0&.v=1
Pictures were copied from http://www.hiltonworldwide.com/assets/images/brands/HHonors_mk_logo_colorhhonorslogodwnld.jpg; and https://secure.ichotelsgroup.com/h/d/pc/1/en/login?secure=true.

Comments

  1. A follow-up news on 02/22/2010 --- More Hilton's "loyalty" guests switch to other brands.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61K20C20100222

    ReplyDelete
  2. Follow-up: Beatles tour promoter wins 2 million points in hotel loyalty war contest ---

    http://content.usatoday.com/communities/hotelcheckin/post/2010/04/intercontinental-hotels-group-names-winner-in-contest-aimed-at-rival-hilton/1

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is It OK for Hotel Staff to Wear Piercings and Tattoos?

Time has changed. I see more and more college students wearing piercings and tattoos nowadays, but is it OK for hotel staff to wear piercings and tattoos? The answer is “no, no, no.” According a report at USAToday.com, customers across the board do not want to see any hotel workers with pierced eyebrow, pierced tongue, tattooed arm, or nose ring. Some may argue that tattooed and pierced workers may seem more acceptable in edgy boutique hotels as compared to the big franchised hotels, but the survey results did not find any differences among a variety of lodging products. Many respondents believe people who wear visible tattoos and piercings are taking a high risk of their professional lives. If you stay in a hotel, do you mind being served by tattooed and/or pierced staff? What if you are the one who makes the hiring decision? References: USAToday.com: http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010 Picture was downloaded from http://tinyurl.com/linchikwok08042010P

Where Coffee Meets Culture: My Experience with Orientation, Socialization, and Culture at Dutch Bros (by Karina Martinez)

When people think of Dutch Bros, they usually picture colorful drinks, loud music, free stickers, and baristas so friendly they’ll jump in the car with you.  As someone who has had the opportunity to work for Dutch Bros, I can say that the energy customers feel isn’t an act; it is the result of intentional and effective HR practices that are focused on orientation, socialization, and culture. From your very first day, you experience how these practices shape the entire Dutch experience.  Orientation, Socialization, Culture   In HR management, orientation is the introduction of the role and company to new hires. This is intended to help them feel welcomed and informed. Socialization goes beyond the initial training process; it’s how new hires grasp the organization’s values, behaviors, and traditions over time. Together, these fun...

Average/Below-Average Looking People Can Earn as Much as the Attractive Ones

Research has shown that attractive people can not only charm interviewers (and thus get hired easier), they are also more likely to earn more as compared to those with average or below-average looks. Accordingly to a Wall Street Journal report , attractive people can earn 3% - 4% more than a person with below-average look. If such difference adds up over a person’s lifetime, an attractive person can earn up to $230,000 more than an ugly worker; even an average-looking person can make $140,000 more. Another relevant Wall Street Journal report also suggests that workers who exercise regularly can earn 9% more than those who do not. If that is the fact (I believe it is), is it legal? Can employers do that? Linchi Kwok and Otto @SyracuseU Career Fair To my knowledge, no law or regulation under EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) considers a person’s look as a protective class. It is true that people in general have an idea of what kind of person they feel attract...